NATO’s 60th Anniversary…Because War is Peace

Posted in Anti-War with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 22, 2008 by mdbergfeld

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) is the most powerful military organization in the world. It was literally founded out of anxiety of Communist Russia’s expansion in 1949. When founded, the alliance had twelve members now it counts 26 member states amongst which 10 states used to be controlled by the Soviet Union.

The fact that NATO will be celebrating its 60th anniversary in Strasbourg/Kehl on April 4, 2009 is a symbolic manifestation of imperialistic warmongering with unprecedented character. Institutions like the IMF, World Bank, G8 and NATO are the phenomena of globalised capital in a day and age labeled  as ‘global governance’. As these institutions act in all parts of the world a campaign against NATO can only be internationalist as it does not begin or end with the event itself but is ultimately linked to the capitalist system we live in. Events like the NATO’s 60th anniversary or the WTO’s infamous meetings are displays of power.

Strasbourg and Kehl have been chosen for a specific reason. They are known for their supra-national co-operation and furthermore NATO has never set foot in Strasbourg, the French city in which the European parliament is situated and which symbolizes Europe’s commitment to human rights. Here, NATO’s own vision of democracy and freedom will be sealed with a paper called ‘Towards a grand strategy for an uncertain world’.

Currently we are experiencing the dismantling of the welfare state in Europe and a phase of imperialism. The Lisbon Treaty which was refuted by the Irish people is a legal manifesto to lock in the neoliberal ideology as it entails the obligation to privatize health and education by 2012. It does not only propose the installation of a European army but also compels member states to further militarize – a legal compulsion to spend on arms annually. And at the same time it employs the language of Bush’s ‘War on Terror’. On the issue of imperialism the operating fields of Afghanistan and Iraq lay open that these are not wars about human and women’s rights but about the expansion of markets and the exploitation of resources  - as well as being ideological : there can be no god besides the free market economy.

In face of the devastating NATO activities in Afghanistan and in history it seems necessary to discover alternatives which are in the interest of the peoples’ of the world. War has become ever-present and more shockingly this new world order is sub-titled ‘no more peace without war’. The protest against NATO is thus linked with the resistance in the Middle East. The self-determination of the people must be our paradigm. This mean defending the resistance movements which are being demonized by the Western media. We shouldn’t fall into the trap of glorifying these movements yet we have to keep the arguments running. The crucial question here is whether the main dynamic of armed action is aimed against the occupation. Thus, we are building our movement against our own government – the war machine itself – by protesting the 60th anniversary and demanding our governments to dissolve NATO.

With the current East-West crisis manifesting itself in Georgia the militarization of Eastern Europe is being accelerated. The United States has signed a deal with Poland allowing it to install missiles at a base on the Baltic Sea. It already has an agreement to build a radar station in the Czech Republic. Supposedly the US and European forces could be threatened by Iran or another ‘rogue state’ such as North Korea. However, the reasons for these hasty maneuvers are more obvious than the mainstream press likes to admit. The installation of about 110 US soldiers and two military bases in Poland does not stand in connection to a threat posed by Iranian missiles but is a direct military confrontation with Russia still grasping for influence in the region.

Protests against NATO in April 2009 will show the world’s leaders that NATO are responsible for an ever-increasing arms race and the instability we live in. With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact in 1990 NATO became obsolete and came into its heaviest crisis – though not for long. Politicians in Europe and the USA replaced the threat of communism with something else – Islam. And in 1991 the USA launched its first war against Iraq. This war cost 100 000 people their lives and facilitated NATO’s renaissance.

In March 1999 NATO launched an internationally condemned interventionist strike against what used to be Yugoslavia. Whilst in combat NATO released a paper with its new strategy for further military operations. As mentioned before Afghanistan is a further operating field. All of these operations serve the purpose of securing resources for the capitalist economies of the West and the hegemony over the world markets.

The surprising attack of Georgia’s military on the autonomous regions of South Ossetia and Abchasia was meant to incorporate Georgia ideologically as well as politically. However, the attack failed and Russia proved to be stronger. The military confrontation of a US ally with Russia posed and still poses a threat to world peace.

In April 2009 people from across Europe will bring the real strategy for an uncertain world to the streets and block the roads of Strasbourg and Kehl for a world without war.

Ramona - Ein deutsches Porträt

Posted in Kurzgeschichten, column with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 18, 2008 by mdbergfeld

Die Ampel der einzigen Straßenkreuzung in Lechenich ist im roten Bereich zur Ruhe gekommen. Ab und an drückt Ramona auf den grünen Knopf der Fußgängerampel; wartet darauf dass ein Auto hupt, dass der Fahrer eines Mittelklassewagens oder eines Sportwagens asiatischer Herkunft das Fenster runterlässt, nach dem Preis fragt und sie einsteigen lässt. Ramona verkauft das was dieses Land als Liebe versteht. Sie verkauft sich, deswegen ist sie – an der Straßenkreuzung in Lechenich, so heißt es.

Nach der Frau kommt die Sehnsucht kommt Ramona. Angebot bestimmt die Nachfrage. Nachfrage bestimmt den Preis. Ramona bestimmt den Preis ihrer Arbeit. Doch was ist eigentlich aus der NO LIMITS BAR geworden? Sehe ich so aus, als ob ich das wüsste. Ich mache nur meine Arbeit. Genau. Ramona macht nur ihre Arbeit. Sie arbeitet genau wie die Fahrer, ihre Frauen und wie es auch ihre Kinder später tun werden müssen. Um welchen Preis? Um in einer deutschen Ortschaft zu leben, irgendwann in Ruhe sterben zu können und in Ehre auf dem Friedhof begraben zu werden.

Die Straßenlaternen leuchten wie von Gottes Hand auf, denn Lechenich schläft schon und Ramona sitzt auf einem Beifahrersitz, während eine andere Hand das Handschuhfach öffnet und nach Kondomen greift. Die einzig vorhandene Hoffnung ist Ramonas Hoffnung. Sie hofft dass der Fahrer kein Bild von seiner Frau und seinen Kindern im Handschuhfach neben den Kondomen liegen hat.

Zwei hässliche Ampelintervalle und der letzte leere Bus, danach ist grün die Ruhephase; das Lechenicher Phänomen der Nacht und Lechenich schläft. Die Ampeln sind grün und Ramona hat Arbeit.

Sechs Zylinder, Hundertachtzehn PS. Mit der Sonne im Rückspiegel und der Dunkelheit voraus. Lechenich träumt in seinem ruhigen Schlaf, Lechenich stellt sich doof und glaubt einfach fest daran, dass Gott auf seiner Seite ist. Auf der Seite der Fahrer, ihrer Frauen und ihrer Kinder. Nicht auf Ramonas Seite. Lechenich schläft bis Tagesanbruch, und wenn die Sonne über Lechenich und seiner Straßenkreuzung aufgeht, wird Lechenich weiterschlafen.

Doch eines Tages wenn Ramona am Fahrbahnrand am Ortsausgang –Lechenich Stadtrechte seit 1275 – neben zerplatzten LKW-Reifen und leeren Benzinkanistern gefunden wird, wacht Lechenich auf und wird wieder zur Ruhe kommen.

Die Ampel ist grün und bleibt grün. Und die NO LIMITS BAR ist eine Autofahrschule.

DEFEND ARTEM LIEBENTHAL AND THE RIGHT TO PROTEST AT OUR CAMPUSES

Posted in Anti-War, civil liberties with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 18, 2008 by mdbergfeld

Wednesday, 17 September 2008

On Friday the 12th Sept Newcastle College invited onto campus the army in order to do a presentation to recruit students with the promise of financial assistance for college and University fees. This time last year the Students’ Union passed a policy against Army recruitment on campus and banned the Army from the fresher’s fair.

Last Friday an emergency protest was organised by students at Newcastle College. Artem and other students went into the presentation to ask simply ‘How many of our students would be killed’? for this he was threatened with security and in the end left of his free will.

The following Monday Artem was told by phone that he was being suspended for a week pending an investigation and a disciplinary hearing on the 22nd Sept.

No other student involved in the protest is being punished for the same activities that Artem carried out. This is simply a way to spread fear and intimidation in order to paralyse any student activism, democracy or accountability.

Those of us who wish to defend our rights to speak out, to vote, to stand in elections or to organise on campus as activists should have the right to do so. Democracy and human rights are not something that you leave at the doorstep of the college but something that you carry with you everywhere you go.

Defend democracy, defend our right to speak out, defend Artem Liebenthal! Download the leaflet defending Artem.

Breaking News…sign the online petition here
What you can do…
1) Email to complain to the college linda.moore@ncl-coll.ac.uk
2) Email Artem in support artem_88@web.de
3) Join the protest (details below)
4) Get support from your Students’/Trade Union

Join the protest
PROTEST OUTSIDE HIS DISCIPLINARY HEARING
MONDAY 22ND SEPT 12NOON, ASSEMBLE ON
ELSWICK EAST TERRACE
(Please bring union banners, delegations etc. etc.)

http://www.stopwar.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=770&Itemid=27
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
<!–
document.write( ‘</’ );
document.write( ’span>’ );
//–>

a note upon modern poesy

Posted in poetry with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 16, 2008 by mdbergfeld

Some time ago Lasalle said: “Only when science and the workers, these opposite poles of society, become one, will they crush in their arms of steel all obstacles to culture.” The entire strength of the modern labour movement rests on theoretic knowledge.

Only when the great mass of workers take the keen and dependable weapons of scientific socialism in their own hands, will all the petty-bourgeois inclinations, all the opportunistic currents, come to naught. The movement will then find itself on sure and firm ground. “Quantity will do it.”

a note upon modern poesy

poetry has come a long way, though very slowly;

you aren’t as old as I am

and I can remember reading

magazines where at the end of a poem

It said:

Paris, 1928.

that seemed to make a

difference, and so, those who could afford to

(and some who couldn’t)

went to

PARIS

and wrote.

I am also old enough so that I remember when poems

made many references to the Greek and Roman

gods.

if you didn’t know your gods you weren’t a very good

writer.

also, if you couldn’t slip a line of

Spanish, French or

Italian

you certainly weren’t a very good writer.

5 or 6 decades ago,

Maybe 7, some poets started using

“i” for “I”

or

“&” for “and.”

many still use a small

“i” and many more continue to use the

“&”

feeling that this is

poetically quite effective and

up-to-date.

also, the oldest notion still in vogue is

that if you can’t understand a poem then

it almost certainly is a

good one.

poetry is still moving slowly forward, I guess,

and when your average garage mechanics

start bringing books of poesy to read

on their lunch breaks

then we’ll know for sure we’re moving in

the right

direction.

&

of this

i

am sure.

Charles Bukowksi

Video/Audio: Hessen-Ypsilanti soll nach Berlin

Posted in Youtube with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 16, 2008 by mdbergfeld

Ein Radiomoderator linkte SPD-Politikerin Ypsilanti am Telefon. Der Mitschnitt erschien im Internet. Medienjurist Schertz rät der Partei zur Klage gegen den Sender.

BERLIN taz Andrea Ypsilanti sitzt gerade in einer Besprechung, als das Telefon in der SPD-Fraktion im hessischen Landtag klingelt. Der Anrufer gibt sich als Mitarbeiter von Franz Müntefering aus. Das Gespräch wird sofort durchgestellt. Der angebliche Parteichef kommt schnell zur Sache. Er erkundigt sich nach der Lage, mäkelt an ihrer geplanten Zusammenarbeit mit der Partei Die Linke herum und macht der Fraktionschefin ein Angebot: Sie solle Roland Koch (CDU) als Ministerpräsidenten im Amt belassen und dafür Generalsekretärin der SPD in Berlin werden. Ypsilanti lehnt empört ab. Dann lässt der Anrufer die Bombe platzen: Er sei Moderator des Hannoveraner Senders Radio ffn.

hier weiter lesen: http://www.taz.de/1/politik/deutschland/artikel/1/der-falsche-franz/

The War on Terror targets Pakistan

Posted in Anti-War, Youtube with tags , , , , , , , , , on September 15, 2008 by mdbergfeld

Read my article here:

http://ourstreets.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/pakistan-the-beginning-of-a-long-awaited-spillover/

Urban Soccer - Reclaiming Our Streets…One Way or the Other

Posted in Youtube with tags , , , , , , , , , , on September 15, 2008 by mdbergfeld

How do people reclaim their streets in France and put the property question into practice?

Movie about the Red Army Faction hits the cinemas

Posted in Youtube with tags , , , , , , , , , on September 15, 2008 by mdbergfeld

Here’s the trailer for the new movie about the Red Army Faction called the “Baader Meinhof Komplex”.

Confronting Empire

Posted in Anti-War, socialism with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 15, 2008 by mdbergfeld

Our question these days ought to be: “How do we confront empire?” There’s no easy answer. And when we listen to Arundhati Roy Empire has ambigious meanings and different players which march arm in arm with the project called Empire.

On June 15 Empire was confronted. We marched arm in arm. We fought  the American government and its European allies which have produced relgious bigotry (this time in form of islamophobia), growing nationalism  and a police state within the borders. The War on Terror looms today at every corner of the world from Kabul to Karatchi to Cochambamba to Caracas to Caucasia. And new flashpoints are soon to appear near you.

Here are some people and scenes Bush didn’t get to see when he visited Europe a final time. And when Obama or McCain visit us the next time we’ll be marching for “Troops Out Now - Stop the Spread of War”.

Initially the march had been forbidden.

Police was expecting us to march down to Downing Street

Not only riot police were present.

A large amount of trouble can be traced back to

agents provocateurs.

Fuck Police Brutality

Where’s the divide?

No comment.

More than 25 arrests that day. Trials to come…

Only tomatoe but the blood spilled that day

Here’s the divide…

Once the cops understand that they should be

standing on our side of the divide Empire will remain

an insurmountable fortress.

Marx, Guevara, Castro & the culture industry

Posted in Youtube, socialism with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 12, 2008 by mdbergfeld

I just thought I’d share this ad. Maybe one day I will write a piece on it.

Pakistan - the beginning of a long expected spillover

Posted in Anti-War, News, war on terror with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 12, 2008 by mdbergfeld

If one had asked anti-war activists, socialists and sympathizers of the left which country were to be the next target of Bush’s ‘war on terror’ Iran would have probably been the answer a year ago. But as even journalists in the mainstream media were preparing for an attack on Iran the events of the last few weeks appear to come out of nowhere. As Pakistan has been co-operating with the Bush regime since the beginning of the war on terror it seemed remote that it now would be facing an American invasion. And indeed, it is unprecedented that the USA is moving into an allied country.

The message that Washington is sending to the ruling classes of Pakistan is: Commit yourself to the war on terror or else you will be next on the list! Yet, the reality draws a slightly different picture. For years now the CIA has been firing missiles in Pakistan from a remotely Predator aircraft. Whilst in 2007 when Musharraf was still in power the Bush administration only deployed three illegal missile attacks against Pakistan, in 2008 it already has been 11 and most of them in the last two months. In mid-June US soldiers attacked a Pakistan border unit and killed 11 Pakistani soldiers.

America’s paradigm ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’ applies to Pakistan as much as it did to the Taliban during the Cold War. There are rumors that the Pakistani government agreed to this display of strength at the Afghan-Pakistan border when Yusuf Raza Gillani, Pakistan’s prime minister visited the White house in July. According to the New York Times this was the same month that President Bush approved orders to allow special operations forces to carry out ground assaults.

Since the September 3rd the northwestern frontier of Pakistan is “the new frontline of the war on terror” as Bush calls it. North Waziristan, in the northwest of the country bordering Afghanistan, is seen by the US as a safe haven for supporters of the Taliban and al-Qaeda. James Appathurai, a Nato spokesman, said the alliance did not support cross-border attacks or deeper incursions in to Pakistani territory. “The Nato policy, that is our mandate, ends at the border. There are no ground or air incursions by Nato forces into Pakistani territory,” he said. Yet, in the light that Pakistan has not been able to set up authority in these tribal areas the USA feels it is its task to fight the War on Terror even if this means a violation against territorial sovereignty.

Undoubtedly there has been political instability in Pakistan. Internally, many people have lost confidence in the PPP (People’s Party of Pakistan): 80% of the population believes that it is just a continuance of the Musharraf’s rule. The violation of the country’s sovereignty in times where the ruling class is divided on the issue of the war on terror will lead to a display of unity in face of invasion and could result in further repression as well as cuts in the living standard of people. “Unilateral action by the American forces does not help the war against terror because it only enrages public opinion,” said Husain Haqqani, Pakistan’s ambassador to Washington, during a speech on Friday. “In this particular incident, nothing was gained by the action of the troops.”

Currently, the Taliban does not control the northwestern border region. Here, the resident tribes have been successful in building up resistance against the Taliban. This is a remarkable success as the USA has not achieved this in neighboring Afghanistan or in Iraq. However, the Taliban’s influence is growing within the population as there is a political vacuum as Pakistani troops are safeguarding the region since the PPP took power in February. This could lead to a clash between Pakistani and US troops. Of course, this encompasses the possibility of igniting a region-wide war. Pakistan’s top army officer said Wednesday that his forces would not tolerate American incursions like the one that took place last week and that the army would defend the country’s sovereignty “at all costs.”

As the presidential elections are nearing the Bush administration does not seem to calm down but rather play the political card of ‘polarization’. This could lead EU countries to have to re-commit themselves to the ‘war on terror’ as well as other countries such as Pakistan, Lybia or recently seen in Georgia. By pressuring enough allies the USA would be able to maintain their military hegemony – but only for a short while.

The War on Terror has been lost as Vietnam was lost long before 1973. Now it is up to the anti-war movements around the world whether this was the end of the beginning of a spillover. As Karl Liebknecht said in 1915: “Der Hauptfeind steht im eigenen Land!“

Further Reading:

http://www.counterpunch.org/tariq09082008.html (Tariq Ali)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/washington/11policy.html?fta=y (New York Times)